HomeTopic NotesFluids, Nutrition & Metabolism
Topic Notes — Perioperative Care

Fluids, Nutrition & Metabolism

From balanced crystalloids and GDFT targets to TPN complications and the MUST screening tool — the complete perioperative fluid and nutrition framework for MS and DNB exams.

9 Subtopics MS / DNB High-Yield NICE CG174 · SSC 2021

Balanced Crystalloids vs Normal Saline

Balanced crystalloids vs normal saline comparison diagram
Balanced crystalloids vs normal saline — composition, clinical evidence, and selection guide — AI-generated diagram, verify with textbook

Definitions

Normal Saline (NS / 0.9% NaCl): 154 mEq/L each of Na&spplus; and Cl&supminus;; slightly hyperchloremic and hyperosmolar (~308 mOsm/L); pH ~5.5.

Balanced Crystalloids (BC): Ringer’s Lactate (RL) and Plasma-Lyte — electrolyte composition closer to plasma; chloride partially replaced by metabolisable buffers (lactate in RL; acetate + gluconate in Plasma-Lyte).

Composition Comparison

ParameterBalanced CrystalloidsNormal SalinePlasma
Na&spplus; (mmol/L)130–140154140
Cl&supminus; (mmol/L)98–110154103
BufferLactate (RL) / Acetate+Gluconate (PL)NoneBicarbonate
pH6.5–7.4~5.57.4
Osmolarity (mOsm/L)273–294308295
Volume distribution25% intravascular, 75% interstitialSame100% intravascular

Pathophysiology — Why NS Causes Problems

  • High chloride load → hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis via dilutional bicarbonate loss and direct renal tubular effects
  • Renal vasoconstriction → reduced GFR → increased AKI risk in some settings
  • Balanced crystalloids mitigate these effects — electrolyte profile closer to physiology

Clinical Evidence by Setting

SettingBC AdvantageCaution
Adult sepsisReduced 28-day mortality, lower AKI (SSC 2021 weak recommendation)Low-quality evidence, more RCTs needed
Paediatric sepsisLower mortality, AKI, hyperchloraemia, shorter stay
DKA (adults)Faster metabolic resolution, faster insulin weaningStrong support for BC
TBIPotentially harmful — BC may be hypotonic → cerebral oedemaPrefer NS in TBI
Critically ill (general)Possibly lower composite mortality/AKIMixed, inconclusive overall

Practical Recommendations

  1. Balanced crystalloids generally preferred in adult sepsis, paediatric sepsis, and DKA
  2. Normal saline remains appropriate in: TBI (cerebral oedema risk), alkalosis/hypochloraemia needing chloride load, hyperkalaemia (avoid lactate in RL)
  3. Choice should be individualized and context-specific
Exam Tip BC = more physiologic composition, reduces hyperchloraemic acidosis risk. SSC 2021 gives a weak recommendation for BC in adult sepsis. NS still indicated in TBI — balanced fluids may be relatively hypotonic and worsen cerebral oedema. Key differentiator: RL contains lactate (avoid in severe liver failure); Plasma-Lyte contains acetate+gluconate (safer in liver failure).

Colloids vs Crystalloids

Definitions

Crystalloids: solutions of small molecules (electrolytes ± buffers) that pass freely through semipermeable membranes. Volume expands both intravascular and interstitial compartments.

Colloids: solutions of large-molecular-weight substances (proteins or polysaccharides) that stay in the intravascular space by exerting oncotic pressure.

Classification

  • Crystalloids: Isotonic (0.9% NS, RL), Hypotonic (0.45% NS, D5W), Hypertonic (3% NS, 7.5% NS)
  • Colloids — Natural: Albumin (4%, 5%, 20%), Fresh Frozen Plasma
  • Colloids — Synthetic: Gelatins (Haemaccel, Gelofusine), Dextrans (Dextran-40, -70), HES (hydroxyethyl starch — withdrawn/restricted)

Volume Effect

  • Crystalloids: 1L expands plasma volume by ~250–300 mL (rest redistributes to interstitium)
  • Colloids: 1L expands plasma volume by ~800–1000 mL if endothelium is intact
  • In capillary leak (sepsis, burns), colloids escape into interstitium — advantage is negated, oedema worsened

Key Trial Evidence

  • SAFE trial (NEJM 2004): 4% albumin vs NS in 7,000 ICU patients — no overall mortality difference. Subgroup: TBI — albumin associated with increased mortality
  • VISEP, 6S, CHEST trials: HES linked to increased AKI, increased RRT, possibly increased mortality — HES now restricted/avoided in sepsis and renal dysfunction

Comparison Table

FeatureCrystalloidsColloids
Oncotic pressureLowHigh
Volume expansionShort-lived; ~25% remains intravascularMore sustained; ~80% intravascular (if intact endothelium)
CostLowHigh (esp. albumin)
Allergy riskMinimalYes (gelatins, dextrans)
CoagulopathyDilutional with large volumesDextrans, HES worsen coagulation
Renal toxicityRare (hyperchloraemia with NS)HES — significant AKI risk

Current Recommendations

  1. First line: balanced crystalloids for initial resuscitation in most surgical/ICU patients
  2. Normal saline: TBI, hyponatraemia, metabolic alkalosis needing chloride
  3. Albumin: adjunct in sepsis with hypoalbuminaemia after crystalloids; cirrhosis with large-volume paracentesis
  4. Synthetic colloids (HES, dextran, gelatin): avoid in sepsis, burns, renal dysfunction
Exam Tip No strong mortality benefit of colloids over crystalloids in most settings. Synthetic colloids (esp. HES) largely abandoned in critical care — AKI and coagulopathy risk (CHEST, 6S trials). Albumin has a niche role: sepsis with hypoalbuminaemia; cirrhosis + large-volume paracentesis (give 8g albumin per litre drained). In capillary leak states, colloids offer no advantage over crystalloids.

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT)

GDFT perioperative fluid bolus challenge decision algorithm
GDFT perioperative fluid bolus challenge — stroke volume-guided decision algorithm — AI-generated diagram, verify with textbook

Definition

An individualised, dynamic approach to perioperative fluid administration guided by specific physiological targets (haemodynamic and perfusion parameters), aiming to optimise tissue oxygen delivery while avoiding both hypovolaemia and fluid overload.

Rationale

Traditional fixed-formula fluid therapy (body weight × estimated losses) leads to under-resuscitation (hypoperfusion, AKI) or overload (pulmonary oedema, impaired wound healing). GDFT uses real-time monitoring to titrate fluids to the patient’s physiological response.

GDFT Algorithm

Step 1: Give fluid bolus (200–250 mL crystalloid) over 5–10 min
Step 2: Assess response — measure SV, CO, SVV or PPV
Step 3a: Stroke volume rises ≥10% → fluid responsive → repeat bolus
Step 3b: No significant SV rise → fluid unresponsive → stop fluids, consider inotropes/vasopressors
Step 4: Reassess after each intervention

GDFT Monitoring Parameters

ParameterTargetInterpretation
Urine output≥0.5 mL/kg/hrAdequate renal perfusion
MAP≥65 mmHgEnsures organ perfusion
SVV (Stroke Volume Variation)<10–12% after optimisation>13% → fluid responsive
PPV (Pulse Pressure Variation)<12%>12% suggests preload responsiveness
Stroke volumeOptimise to plateauNo further rise after bolus = target met
Cardiac index>2.2 L/min/m²Adequate cardiac output
ScvO₂>70%DO₂/VO₂ balance
Serum lactate<2 mmol/LElevated → tissue hypoperfusion
BUN:Creatinine ratio10–20 normal>20 hypovolaemia; <10 overload
PaO₂:FiO₂>300<300 suggests pulmonary overload/ARDS

Devices Used

  • Oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ) — non-invasive; standard for GDFT in UK
  • LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac — minimally invasive cardiac output monitors
  • Pulmonary artery catheter — gold standard but invasive; largely replaced

Evidence

OPTIMISE trial and multiple meta-analyses show GDFT reduces postoperative renal/pulmonary complications and hospital stay. Recommended by ERAS protocols. Effect on mortality less clear in lower-risk surgery.

Exam Tip GDFT mnemonic “U-MaSS-COLaB-Pa”: Urine ≥0.5 · MAP ≥65 · SVV <12% · SV optimised · CO >2.2 · ScvO₂ >70% · Lactate <2 · BUN:Cr 10–20 · PaO₂/FiO₂ >300. SVV and PPV require mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes ≥8 mL/kg to be reliable — not valid in spontaneously breathing patients.

IV Fluid Therapy in Adults — NICE CG174

The 5 R’s of IV Fluid Therapy

  1. Resuscitation — restore intravascular volume in compromised patients
  2. Routine maintenance — meet daily basic fluid and electrolyte needs
  3. Replacement — correct existing deficits (dehydration, bleeding, losses)
  4. Redistribution — manage abnormal fluid shifts (oedema, third spacing)
  5. Reassessment — continuous monitoring and adjustment

Indications for Resuscitation

Any of: SBP <100 mmHg; HR >90/min; capillary refill >2 sec; RR >20/min; NEWS ≥5; positive passive leg raise response.

Resuscitation fluid: crystalloid (Na&spplus; 130–154 mmol/L); 500 mL bolus over <15 min; reassess after each bolus.

Routine Maintenance Prescription

Standard daily requirements:

  • Water: 25–30 mL/kg/day
  • Na&spplus;, K&spplus;, Cl&supminus;: ~1 mmol/kg/day each
  • Glucose: 50–100 g/day (prevents ketosis)

Typical day-1 fluid: 0.18% NaCl + 4% dextrose + 27 mmol/L K&spplus;, ≤2.5 L/day.

Reduce to 20–25 mL/kg/day in: elderly, cardiac failure, renal disease, refeeding risk.

Maintenance Rule “30 : 1 : 100” — 30 mL/kg water · 1 mmol/kg Na/K/Cl · 100 g glucose per day. Never add K&spplus; directly to IV bag — always use pre-mixed bags.

Common IV Fluids — Composition

FluidNa&spplus; (mmol/L)Cl&supminus; (mmol/L)Use
0.9% NaCl154154Resuscitation (risk: hyperchloraemic acidosis)
Hartmann’s / RL131111Balanced resuscitation (preferred)
5% Dextrose00Free water replacement (not resuscitation)
4% Dextrose + 0.18% NaCl3030Routine maintenance

Complications of IV Fluid Therapy

ComplicationDefinitionTime Frame
HypovolaemiaClinical dehydration, ↑urea/Cr, low urine outputDuring therapy
Pulmonary oedemaBreathlessness, X-ray infiltratesDuring / ≤6h post-IVF
HyponatraemiaNa&spplus; <130 mmol/L≤24h post-IVF
HypernatraemiaNa&spplus; ≥155 mmol/L≤24h post-IVF
Hypo/hyperkalaemiaK&spplus; <3.0 or >5.5 mmol/L≤24h post-IVF
Peripheral oedemaPitting oedema without cardiac/renal cause≤24h post-IVF
Exam Tip NICE CG174 applies to adults ≥16 yr in hospital (excludes pregnancy, severe renal/liver disease, DKA, burns, ICU). The 5 R’s are the framework — Resuscitation, Routine maintenance, Replacement, Redistribution, Reassessment. Resuscitation: 500 mL balanced crystalloid bolus over <15 min, reassess. Check serum chloride daily if 0.9% NaCl is used for maintenance.

Artificial Nutritional Support

Introduction & Indications

Adequate nutrition is vital for postoperative recovery and wound healing. Artificial nutritional support is indicated when oral intake is inadequate for >5 days, or earlier in malnourished patients.

Commonly required in: major head/neck/GI surgery (oesophagectomy, gastrectomy, Whipple’s), severe trauma/burns, sepsis, neurological impairment, prolonged ileus, high-output fistulae.

Routes — Enteral vs Parenteral

FeatureEnteral NutritionParenteral Nutrition
RouteGI tractIntravenous (peripheral or central)
Gut integrityMaintains mucosal integrity and GALTMucosal atrophy, bacterial translocation risk
Infection riskLowerHigher (catheter-related sepsis)
CostCheaperExpensive
IndicationWhen gut is functionalWhen gut unusable or contraindicated
Main complicationsAspiration, diarrhoea, tube issuesMetabolic, hepatic, catheter-related
Core Principle Enteral nutrition is always preferred over parenteral when the gut is functional. “If the gut works, use it.” Enteral feeding preserves gut mucosal integrity, prevents bacterial translocation, and is cheaper with fewer complications.
Exam Tip Key points to remember: (1) Start nutritional support within 5 days of inadequate oral intake; earlier in malnourished patients. (2) Prevent refeeding syndrome with slow initiation and electrolyte monitoring. (3) Central venous access required for TPN >14 days (high osmolarity). (4) Regular MDT input — surgeon, dietician, physician.

Enteral Nutrition

Definition

Delivery of nutrients directly into the GI tract through oral, gastric, or post-pyloric routes, when normal oral intake is inadequate but the gut is functional.

Types by Nutrient Composition

  • Polymeric: intact protein, polysaccharides, long-chain TG — requires normal digestion; standard for most patients
  • Elemental/monomeric: amino acids, monosaccharides, MCT — for malabsorption, short bowel, pancreatitis
  • Semi-elemental (oligomeric): peptides, oligosaccharides, MCT — intermediate absorption
  • Disease-specific: renal (low protein/K), hepatic (BCAA-enriched), pulmonary (high fat/low CHO), diabetic (low GI, fibre-added)

Access Routes by Duration

RouteDurationIndication
Nasogastric (NG)≤4–6 weeksShort-term; intact gag reflex; most common
Nasojejunal (NJ)≤4–6 weeksHigh aspiration risk; acute pancreatitis
PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy)>4–6 weeksLong-term; intact gastric emptying; neurological conditions
RIG (Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomy)>4–6 weeksEndoscopy not feasible
Jejunostomy (PEJ / surgical)Long-termGastroparesis; gastric outlet obstruction; post-oesophagectomy

Advantages of Enteral over Parenteral

  • Physiological: preserves gut mucosal integrity; maintains GALT; decreases bacterial translocation; stimulates bile flow and pancreatic secretions
  • Clinical: lower infection incidence; better glycaemic control; early EN reduces post-op ileus and improves wound healing
  • Practical: cheaper; easier administration; fewer metabolic complications

Complications

CategoryComplications
MechanicalMalposition, kinking, blockage, dislodgement; nasal/oesophageal ulceration, sinusitis; aspiration pneumonia
GastrointestinalNausea, vomiting, distension; diarrhoea (osmotic/rapid infusion); constipation; GI bleeding
MetabolicElectrolyte imbalance; hyperglycaemia; refeeding syndrome; dehydration or overload
InfectiveSinusitis, otitis (nasal tubes); peristomal infection (PEG/jejunostomy); peritonitis (leak)

Contraindications

Absolute: intestinal obstruction (mechanical or paralytic ileus); severe mesenteric ischaemia; peritonitis or intra-abdominal sepsis; severe GI haemorrhage; inability to access GI tract safely.

Relative: high aspiration risk with unprotected airway; haemodynamic instability on high-dose vasopressors (bowel ischaemia risk); severe uncontrolled diarrhoea; severe pancreatitis (NJ feeding often still feasible).

Exam Tip NG tube is the commonest enteral access — use for ≤4–6 weeks. PEG if >4–6 weeks needed (endoscopic placement, internal bumper). Jejunostomy placed intraoperatively during oesophagectomy or gastrectomy for post-op feeding. NJ tube for pancreatitis or high aspiration risk. Refeeding syndrome risk: start at 10 kcal/kg/day and increase slowly over 4–7 days; supplement thiamine.

Parenteral Nutrition (PN)

Definition

Administration of nutrients intravenously, bypassing the GI tract, to provide substrates for energy, growth, and tissue repair when enteral feeding is not possible.

Types

  • Partial PN (PPN): supplies part of daily requirements; peripheral access acceptable; lower osmolarity (<900 mOsm/L)
  • Total PN (TPN): full caloric/nutritional requirements; requires central venous access (high osmolarity); contains dextrose + amino acids + lipids + electrolytes + vitamins + trace elements

Access Routes

RouteDurationComment
Central Venous Catheter (CVC)Long-termPreferred; reduces thrombophlebitis
PICC lineWeeks–monthsInserted via basilic/cephalic vein; good for home TPN
Peripheral line<14 daysLow osmolarity feeds only (<900 mOsm/L)
Hickman / Implanted port>3 monthsLong-term home TPN; tunnelled

Indications

  • Intestinal obstruction, severe short bowel syndrome, high-output enterocutaneous fistulae
  • Severe pancreatitis where EN not tolerated; intractable vomiting/diarrhoea
  • Perioperative: preoperative severe malnutrition; prolonged postoperative NPO after major GI surgery
  • Critical illness: severe trauma, burns, sepsis where EN not feasible
  • Oncology: malignant bowel obstruction, radiation enteritis

Complications

TypeExamples
Insertion-relatedPneumothorax (0.5–1%; subclavian route), arterial puncture, misplacement — confirm position on CXR
Line-relatedCatheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) up to 15%; thrombosis (SVC occlusion/PE); line blockage
MetabolicHyperglycaemia (most common); refeeding syndrome; electrolyte derangements (Na, K, Mg, PO₄)
Hepatic (IFALD)Fatty liver → fibrosis → cirrhosis (~25% incidence in long-term TPN; especially children)
Metabolic bone diseaseOsteoporosis/osteomalacia; supplement Ca²&spplus;, PO₄, Vit D
Refeeding Syndrome Pathophysiology: rapid feeding in severely malnourished patients → ↓serum phosphate (driven into cells with glucose) → fluid and electrolyte shifts → arrhythmias, cardiac failure, seizures, weakness.

Risk factors: BMI <16; weight loss >15% in 3–6 months; no intake >10 days; low baseline K&spplus;/Mg/PO₄; alcoholism.

Prevention: start at 10 kcal/kg/day; increase slowly over 4–7 days; supplement thiamine, vitamins, trace elements before and during refeeding; monitor electrolytes daily.
Exam Tip Confirm CVC tip position on CXR before starting TPN — tip should be in lower SVC or atriocaval junction. CRBSI: take paired blood cultures (central + peripheral); remove line if Staphylococcus aureus or candida grows. IFALD (intestinal failure-associated liver disease): manage by cycling TPN (resting liver), omega-3 lipid emulsions, and promoting any enteral feeding. Hyperglycaemia: use variable rate insulin infusion; adjust when TPN is interrupted to prevent hypoglycaemia.

Caloric & Protein Requirements

Metabolic Phases After Surgery

PhaseDurationStateFeatures
Ebb phase0–24 hrs↓ Metabolism↓ O₂ consumption, ↓ energy expenditure, ↓ body temperature
Flow phase2–10 days↑ Catabolism↑ cortisol, ↑ catecholamines, ↑ gluconeogenesis, ↑ protein breakdown
Anabolic phaseAfter 7–10 days↑ Protein synthesisTissue repair, positive nitrogen balance

Energy Requirements

Total Energy Requirement (TER) = BEE × (stress factor + activity factor)

ConditionStress FactorApprox. kcal/kg/day
Post-op elective surgery1.1–1.225–30
Moderate infection/trauma1.3–1.530–35
Sepsis / major burns / multiple trauma1.5–2.035–45
Severe burns (>40% BSA)2.0–2.5Up to 50

Protein Requirements

ConditionProtein (g/kg/day)
Normal adult0.8–1.0
Post-operative mild stress1.0–1.2
Moderate stress (infection/trauma)1.3–1.5
Severe stress / burns / sepsis1.5–2.0
Protein-losing conditionsUp to 2.5

Macronutrient Summary

ParameterNormalPost-op mildSevere stress/sepsis
Calories (kcal/kg)2530–3540–50
Protein (g/kg)1.01.2–1.52.0
Carbohydrates (g/kg)3–44–55–6
Fat (g/kg)1.01–22.0
Water (mL/kg)30–3530–4040–50

Nitrogen balance: goal is positive nitrogen balance (nitrogen in > nitrogen out). Nitrogen intake (g) = Protein intake (g) ÷ 6.25.

Exam Tip Energy needs rise with surgical stress severity. Average post-op requirement: 30–35 kcal/kg/day. Average protein: 1.5 g/kg/day. Early enteral feeding within 24–48 hrs preferred to maintain gut integrity. Indirect calorimetry is gold standard if available. Overfeeding → hyperglycaemia, CO₂ retention, fatty liver. Underfeeding → poor wound healing, infection, muscle wasting. Use ideal body weight (not actual) in obese patients.

Nutritional Assessment & MUST Tool

ABCD Approach to Nutritional Assessment

A — Anthropometry

  • BMI = weight (kg) ÷ height² (m²)
  • MUAC (Mid-Upper Arm Circumference)
  • TSF (Triceps Skinfold Thickness)
  • MAMC (Mid-Arm Muscle Circumference) = MUAC − (3.14 × TSF)
  • Caveat: anthropometry is altered by fluid shifts in critically ill patients

B — Biochemistry

  • Albumin: falls in malnutrition/inflammation; not reliable acutely (half-life 20 days)
  • Prealbumin: shorter half-life (2 days) — better acute marker
  • CRP, WBC: inflammation markers
  • Electrolytes (Na&spplus;, K&spplus;, Mg, PO₄): assess refeeding risk

C — Clinical evaluation

  • Symptoms: nausea, vomiting, dysphagia, early satiety, diarrhoea
  • Past history: malignancy, IBD, liver disease, stroke, Parkinson’s
  • Malabsorptive states: short bowel, high-output stoma, enterocutaneous fistula, pancreatic insufficiency

D — Dietary assessment

  • Diet diary or 24-hour dietary recall
  • Compare to requirement (25–35 kcal/kg lean body weight)
  • Recent or anticipated decreased intake >5 days → initiate nutritional support

MUST Tool (Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool)

ParameterScore 0Score 1Score 2
BMI (kg/m²)≥2018.5–20<18.5
Weight loss (3–6 mo)≤5%5–10%>10%
Acute disease effectAdd 2 if likely no intake ≥5 days
Total ScoreRiskAction
0LowRoutine care; weekly hospital reassessment
1MediumObserve; document intake for 3 days
≥2HighDietician referral; initiate nutritional support

Follow-up Frequency

  • Hospital: weekly
  • Care homes: monthly
  • Community: yearly (age >75 years)
Exam Tip MUST is the standard malnutrition screening tool in UK practice — three components: BMI + weight loss + acute disease effect. Score ≥2 = high risk → dietician + nutritional support. ABCD nutritional assessment: Anthropometry, Biochemistry, Clinical, Dietary. In critically ill patients, albumin is unreliable as a nutritional marker (falls with inflammation regardless of intake) — use prealbumin or trend of CRP instead.
Support Suture Line

No ads. No paywall. If it helped, it helped. ☕

☕ Buy me a coffee